|
SEEING THE SMALLER PICTURE When fall deepens and winter is just around the corner, those of us who live where the seasons change are sometimes challenged with finding new subjects for our hobby. If you are an advanced hobbyist, chances are that you are using a Single Lens Reflex (SLR) camera with an interchangeable lens. This is the start of what you need to begin making Macro Photos of one of my favorite subjects: all those other tiny bits that make up the world around us. Even the mostly unnoticed Lichens and Moss can provide an exciting landscape all their own. These mostly tiny plants (actually they are a type of fungus-bacteria conglomeration but I’m no botanist) can be found on rocks, leaves, decaying tree stumps and a myriad of places in the woods or in your own back yard. The almost-endless variations in shapes and colors give you a constantly changing source for subject matter. There are other amazing images to be captured when you start thinking small: the veins in a leaf, the surface of tree bark the intricate detail in a bee’s eye when viewed as a full frame image or less ambitious subjects like flowers and insects. But that tiny world that we bypass in pursuit of our sweeping landscape photos has a treasure trove of other subjects if we just look for them. Best of all, you don’t have to book passage to an exotic locale or carry around a king’s ransom in gear to capture them. To try your hand at this exciting aspect of photography, you will only need a few pieces of equipment. First, you need a camera and lens combination that will allow you to get really close to your subject. Some fairly simple point-and-shoot cameras are able to focus down to incredibly close distances. Look at the camera and see if you can see the word "Macro" on the lens or as a switch or button on the camera somewhere. If you don't see Macro written somewhere then look for a Close-up setting. Chances are that if you don't have a Macro lens then you won't be able to focus close enough for the really tiny details, but don't let that stop you. There are still plenty of interesting patterns and colors that you can still photograph and you might be able to find an accessory macro lens to clip over your camera's lens that will enable you to focus even closer and try this exciting aspect of photography.
If you're lucky enough to have a SLR camera then you're well on your way. Ideally, you want to be able to focus close enough to reproduce your subject at a 1:1 ratio (or 100% of original size) or better. At 1:1, the image projected by your lens onto the surface of your camera's film or digital sensor is the same size as the subject; an object that is one inch wide will reproduce one inch wide on the film or sensor. It's not absolutely imperative that you be able to focus that close but in Macro Photography, the closer you can focus and the bigger the image size captured, the better.
Sharpness
To get really sharp macro photographs, in addition to a decent lens properly focused, you need a stable camera support. When you are close enough to reproduce your subject at 50% or 100%, remember that any camera shake or subject motion will also reproduce at 100% or more. A good, sturdy tripod or other camera platform, augmented by one or two bags of lead shot or sand to help really take the shake out of your camera, will go a long way in removing unwanted vibrations. Another must, in my opinion, is a cable release. A cable release (or electronic shutter cable) will eliminate the shake introduced by your finger pressing the shutter release. If you don't have a cable release, use the self-timer to release the shutter. If you’re using a SLR camera, consider raising the mirror before you shoot if your camera and the subject will permit. The vibration made by the mirror retracting before the exposure can easily cause blur in some situations. At a 100% image size, even your heartbeat will introduce camera shake that can easily ruin your shot at slower shutter speeds! From all that, you can probably guess the next thing to consider: Use as high a shutter speed as you can to still satisfy other considerations in the shot you're trying to get. If you want to shoot at a slow shutter speed and small lens aperture to allow for a greater depth of field, for example, then the issue of camera stability becomes proportionally more pronounced. Finally, remember to take the wind into account and its potential affect on your subject and camera. If you are focused in tight on a flower petal and there’s a breeze then you may need to have something handy to block the wind. A piece of black or white poster board will suit the purpose just fine and can double as a reflector to help fill in dark shadows or cut light off a distracting background. Depth of Field Depth of field, or depth of focus, is the distance in front of and behind the exact point of focus of a lens where objects will appear to be in focus. The closer you get to the subject, the less the apparent sharpness of objects not at the exact point the lens is focused will be. This can be overcome to some extent by using a smaller (larger f-number) shooting aperture. Right here is where many novices run into trouble. Depth of field is apparent sharpness. Most lenses are actually sharpest (highest resolution) at about 1 ½ to 2 f stops down from wide open .
In the animated GIF file above, you can clearly see how the apparent sharpness of the dollar bill improves as the f-stop gets smaller. What is happening is that the depth of field increases but the next GIF will show that the sharpness actually diminishes as the lens is stopped down beyond about f-5.6. The inset is a 100% crop of the wider image. Both images were from un-enhanced RAW files shot on a tripod mounted Nikon D300 with a manually focused 55mm Micro Nikkor lens.
All lenses will have greater depth of field or apparent
overall focus of portions of the image in front of or behind the plane where the lens is focused when stopped down to their smaller apertures. This is a generalization and would not hold true for specialized flat-field lenses, some zoom lenses or where a subject had little or no depth, a photo of type on a page, for example. But we’re not going to get into that nor are we going to tackle more advanced and mystifying aspects of sharpness and depth such as "Circles of Confusion" and "Hyperfocal Distance". We’ll discuss that at another time. There are also techniques for combining photographs to create a composite image displaying tremendous depth but that’s also another subject entirely. As far as we are concerned, the question is whether or not all the parts of our photo that we want to look in focus do and whether or not we lose too much lens sharpness by using a really small aperture.
Don’t overlook the positive effect of the shallow depth of macro photographs in their ability to totally blur out undesirable parts of the composition owing to the lack of depth. A macro photo of a flower, for example, usually won’t have a lot of distracting leaves or sharp detail of the dirt to take attention away from the subject.
Remember these tips: 2) Depth of field will generally extend 1/3 in front of the focus point and 2/3 to the rear of the focus point. Sometimes you can cheat by focusing behind the actual subject point a bit when there is nothing of interest in front of it in order to get more depth behind the subject or vice-versa if the interest is mostly forward of the subject. 3) The faster the shutter speed, the sharper everything is going to be so you will need to strike a balance between depth of field and exposure time. Longer exposures invite subject movement (don’t forget the wind) and camera shake. Finally, I started out talking about seeing the smaller picture in the fall or winter but I find that it can be very rewarding all year long...Forget the "Bigger Picture" once and a while and focus on the "Smaller Picture". |